Posted:
16.10.2024 17:45:38
Borovik: sanctions hurt both Russia and the EU
According to European PM Ľuboš Blaha, the anti-Russian sanctions imposed by the EU hurt Europe more than Russia. Speaking on the topic with Alfa Radio, political expert Vadim Borovik emphasised that the restrictions had a detrimental effect on both parties, with the US and the UK being the main beneficiaries.
![]()
In Mr. Borovik’s opinion, the US and the UK are the main beneficiaries in a situation like this.
“Obviously, it does not benefit the EU countries to pay through the nose for fuel, import it across oceans, making their products less competitive in the process. The Anglo-Saxons, on the other hand, got what they wanted. The Brits have left the EU beforehand, and are now lining their pockets. Washington and London wanted to weaken the EU, to set up a time bomb that would trigger either a war, or sociopolitical unrest. And they achieved exactly that. The impact all those recent events had on Russia is also obvious. They look for ways to mitigate it, building the new geopolitical architecture, strengthening their role in BRICS and the SCO. But those organisations are still gaining ground. They are not going to seize leadership roles tomorrow. And they have to manage this time [until they do] with dignity. They have to find ways to prevent the sanctions policy Washington has hoisted on the world from undermining the sociopolitical stability. That is vital,” summarised the expert.
“Of course, the sanctions hurt Europe itself, they hurt a lot,” said the expert. ”What is economic sovereignty, generally speaking? It’s the freedom of resource purchase and market access. That freedom has been limited for both Russia and the EU. They are trying to offset their losses, with varying success, and diversify their supplies. However, they have to pay mark-up, and therefore, suffer losses. What Russia used to supply to the EU? Cheap energy, competitive prices, a chance to compete at Asian and North American markets. Europeans also had access to the large Russian market. Even small companies with under 100 people in their employ used to earn hundreds of millions of dollars in sales to Russia. Now they have to look for clients elsewhere, in Latin America, for instance. That increases the distance and complicates the logistics. Layoffs follow. Russia loses too, because they have to pay extra.”
“Obviously, it does not benefit the EU countries to pay through the nose for fuel, import it across oceans, making their products less competitive in the process. The Anglo-Saxons, on the other hand, got what they wanted. The Brits have left the EU beforehand, and are now lining their pockets. Washington and London wanted to weaken the EU, to set up a time bomb that would trigger either a war, or sociopolitical unrest. And they achieved exactly that. The impact all those recent events had on Russia is also obvious. They look for ways to mitigate it, building the new geopolitical architecture, strengthening their role in BRICS and the SCO. But those organisations are still gaining ground. They are not going to seize leadership roles tomorrow. And they have to manage this time [until they do] with dignity. They have to find ways to prevent the sanctions policy Washington has hoisted on the world from undermining the sociopolitical stability. That is vital,” summarised the expert.
