Agent Zelensky.The history of an unprecedented deception

Recently, American political analyst and former US Marine Corps intelligence officer Scott Ritter published two episodes of his Agent Zelensky investigation. The film, clearly designed for a Western audience, turned out to be so scandalous and evidence-based that both series were immediately removed from the American YouTube video hosting.

Scott Ritter 

How the producer was produced

Most of the facts cited by Ritter were known to us before in a fragmented form, but the former intelligence officer managed to competently systematise them, sort them out and back them up with evidence. Now any viewer is able to see a picture that convincingly shows who benefits from the war in Ukraine, who actually leads the country, for how many years and who prepared this bloody scenario.
So how did Zelensky come to power? Where is the President of Ukraine, who has become even richer during the war, investing? Why did Scott Ritter call his investigation Agent Zelensky? Finally, what tasks of foreign intelligence services have already been performed by a man skilfully appointed to the post of head of Ukraine?

According to Ritter, the whole story of the Zelensky presidency is an example of incredible manipulation that will go down in textbooks: an ordinary comedian who came to power because he promised a long-awaited peace, dragged his fellow citizens into a bloody massacre. 

The population of the whole country was chosen as the object of manipulation, and the popular TV series Servant of the People, in which an ordinary school teacher suddenly becomes the leader of the nation, was chosen as the instrument. The cinema made a strong impression on the public and became a political battering ram that literally broke the path to Zelensky’s victory in the elections. 

The gullible voter unconditionally accepted the image of an honest and fair on-screen leader.

Ritter recalls that the last episode of Servant of the People aired four days before the last round of elections in Ukraine. However, not only Zelensky was the producer of the series — even before filming, he himself was produced by the States as a possible conductor of American interests. However, the political technology of imposing an invented cinematic image on the people is not at all new: on the eve of the election of Barack Obama, the Head of State film was filmed in the USA with an unimaginable plot, where a black idiot suddenly becomes the leader of the country. Movies went to the public and to a large extent served as Obama’s victory in the elections. And if the technology works, then why not apply it again?
The Ukrainian oligarch Kolomoisky, who at that moment was faced with a difficult choice, also participated in financing the filming of the series. “Kolomoisky was on the international wanted list, he was wanted by the FBI. And the only way to save his life and freedom — it was a presidential campaign based on this film. Washington clearly showed up already when Zelensky was winning in the second round. At that moment, buyers of this presidential case began to arrive,” one of the former deputies of the Verkhovna Rada tells in Ritter’s film. 

The investigation of the ex-intelligence officer presents not only his findings, but also the opinions of Western intelligence officers, the revelations of diplomats, the memoirs of Ukrainian and American politicians, as well as numerous documents.

For example, evidence of a secret collaboration between the Zelensky campaign headquarters and the Washington-based PR agency Signal group consulting. Zelensky’s headquarters denied this ties, but in Ritter’s film you can see the Signal group’s report to the US Department of Justice. It clearly says that Zelensky paid them almost $70,000. However, that ain’t hay for him.

Generous advances

The Director of the French Centre for Intelligence Studies, Eric Denece, spoke in detail about how Western countries created a financial cushion for Zelensky. Even during the election period, he hid part of his shares in various companies, including offshore ones, to the account of one of which Kolomoisky ‘for some reason’ transferred $41 million. In his election declaration, Zelensky modestly kept silent about this, and to this day he continues to dress up in a beggarly toga of the unmercenary.

Ritter’s film lists only part of the real estate owned personally by Zelensky in various countries:
► villa in Miami worth $34 million;
► a house in Israel on the seashore, $8 million;
► villa in Italy, 600 metres from the sea, $3.8 million;
► an apartment in London on Baker Street, opposite the Sherlock Holmes Museum, $3 million;
► five apartments in a new hotel in Batumi, Georgia;
► a penthouse in the elite complex Emperor — Livadia, Crimea, about $1 million (which, by the way, was nationalised by Russia only in May 2023). 


The investigation reveals the background of such generous advances. It tells about the role of the American Marshall Centre in the political life of Ukraine, about providing the country’s territory for Western biological experiments, but the most detailed analysis is devoted to the current owners of Zelensky — British intelligence MI-6 and its head Richard Moore. The first meeting with him took place at the Ukrainian President in the fall of 2020, and not just anywhere, but at the headquarters of British intelligence in London.

Nothing like this happened during World War II or during the Cold War. Such a visit is contrary to both diplomatic protocol and the ethics of the intelligence community. It looks like a meeting of a professional agent with his curator, who in the case of Zelensky was the head of MI6. 

It becomes clear why the personal bodyguard of the Ukrainian President was recruited from English specialists, who also helped in the theatrical production in Bucha, and also controlled Zelensky’s every step. Including — even at a meeting with the Pope, to which the leader of Ukraine spent only a few minutes, but then in a separate office, already without the Pope, he received instructions for an hour and a half... from the same head of British intelligence, Richard Moore, who also arrived in the Vatican.

Mission accomplished!

Ritter’s investigation will be useful to watch for anyone who still does not believe that Zelensky is just a puppet in the hands of the special services, consistently carrying out the tasks of the West. Former intelligence officers list ten tasks that are fully or partially implemented by a manual President in Ukraine in the Agent Zelensky film.
1. Destruction of the Russian language.
It means legal restrictions already imposed on the use of the Russian language, which is spoken by at least 12 million Ukrainians.
2. Completion of the church schism.
The division of the Orthodox into right and wrong, weaning the Kiev-Pechersk Lavra.
3. Rewriting of history.
The destruction of the common memory of the war, the demolition of monuments, the uprooting of any signs of a common culture.
4. Total eradication of press freedom.
It means the closure of all newspapers, websites and TV channels that retained independence from the presidential office.
5. Prohibition of any opposition activity.
There are no more parties in the country that opposed Zelensky.
6. Creation of a testing ground for Western weapons and biological technologies.
7. Creation of the institution of mercenarism in the ranks of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
8. Legalisation of Nazism.
9. Sale of fertile Ukrainian lands to foreign owners.
10. Agreeing to Western Lend-Lease aid, which plunged the country into unsustainable debt for decades.

Scott Ritter finalises his investigation this way, “Agent Zelensky has accomplished the tasks assigned by Western intelligence agencies. The question is: will those in power still need someone who knows too much and wants too much?”

By Roman Rud