Chibisov: National Security Concept and Military Doctrine are Belarus’ most important documents after Constitution

Posted: 23.01.2024 17:23:00 23 January, 17:23

The National Security Concept and the Military Doctrine of Belarus will be considered and approved by the Belarusian People’s Congress. Military analyst Igor Chibisov explains why issues related to challenges and threats, sovereignty and independence, war and peace are becoming increasingly relevant today.

“The National Security Concept and the Military Doctrine are actually the most important key documents of the country after the Constitution. This is a clear and definite plan: how, by whom and in what areas the country’s sovereignty is ensured, and what the reaction will be to attempts to destroy it. It is also a response to new threats and challenges, increasing militarisation and constant NATO military drills near our borders. The Ukrainian conflict, the situation in the Middle East, Taiwan, protest sentiments in Europe... Moreover, in addition to dozens of smouldering conflicts around the world, the aggressive policy of our neighbours is also manifesting itself. NATO plans to transfer hundreds of thousands of soldiers to the borders of Belarus allegedly to repel a hypothetical attack by Russia. Poland is increasing supplies of armoured personnel carriers and purchasing equipment for the production of firearms, while simultaneously asking the US to station nuclear weapons on its territory.

In such an unstable situation, Belarus must have an up-to-date action plan taking into account all possible scenarios for the development of events. Technologies and methods of conducting hybrid wars are constantly being improved, so it is important to be proactive. The new Military Doctrine directly and openly speaks of our main priorities: multi-vectorism and a peaceful policy. But, as our President stresses, this does not mean sacrifice. Yes, we do not threaten anyone, but in case of aggression, the response will be immediate and adequate. For a range of countries, including post-Soviet ones, the National Security Concept is a closed document. For example, NATO’s aggression is visible right on paper, even without any diplomatic formulations. Its strategic concept spells out official enemies: Russia and China. We don’t call anyone ‘adversaries’, but we won’t hide our priorities or reaction in the event of interference in internal affairs or an attempt at aggression,” notes Igor Chibisov.